October 27, 2015
Decision made over requirement that paroled sex offenders post signs on Halloween
Sex offenders on parole will not have to post a sign on the front door of their home on Halloween.
A compromise was reached Monday afternoon between the state's Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and a group that challenged the requirement.
10News was in court as state attorneys decided the sign requirement would not be enforced, prompting the plaintiffs to rescind its temporary restraining order request.
Earlier this month, the group California Reform Sex Offender Laws and a sex offender on parole filed a lawsuit in San Diego federal court that contested the CDCR's requirement.
Janice Bellucci, attorney for the plaintiffs, said, "CDCR's requirement that all parolees post a sign on the front door of their residence violates the First Amendment because it compels speech ... The sign requirement also places in significant danger the lives of sex offenders and those with whom they reside."
According to CDCR, the sign requirement is part of "Operation Boo," which the department conducts every year at Halloween. "Operation Boo" has the stated purpose of protecting children as they trick or treat.
"The sex offender plaintiff in this case was convicted of a single sex offense before 1985 that did not involve a child," Bellucci said. "The plaintiff has not committed or been convicted of a sex offense for the past 30 years and yet CDCR is requiring him to post a sign on the front door of his home. This is a solution without a problem."
Bellucci said CDCR's sign requirement is based on "myth" not facts.
"The facts are there are no reports in California of a sexual assault upon a child who goes trick or treating," Bellucci said.
10News learned the plaintiff's lawsuit is still pending despite Monday's decision. ..Source.. by City News Service
CDCR Withdraws Halloween Sign Requirement Statewide
The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) today announced in federal district court its decision to withdraw a statewide requirement that sex offender parolees post a sign on the front door of their residences on Halloween. Immediately following that announcement, CA RSOL withdrew its request for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO).
“This is a significant victory for more than 10,000 registered citizens and their families,” stated CA RSOL president Janice Bellucci. “They are no longer faced with the risk of significant injury.”
CA RSOL and plaintiff John Doe were represented in court by three attorneys — Janice Bellucci, Chance Oberstein and Alex Landon — who are also members of the CA RSOL board of directors. CDCR was represented by an attorney from the Office of the Attorney General as well as a representative of CDCR.
The plaintiffs in the case alleged that CDCR’s sign requirement violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because it was speech compelled by a government agency. CDCR levied the Halloween sign requirement for the past seven years, even requiring homeless registered citizens to post signs on their sleeping bags, tents and vehicles.
“We are grateful to plaintiff John Doe who showed up, stood up and spoke up,” stated Oberstein. “Without him, we could not have filed this lawsuit.” by CA RSOL
Federal judge rules sex offenders do not have to post ‘no trick-or-treating’ sign
AN DIEGO - A Chula Vista sex offender along with his attorney, sued the California Department of Corrections Sex Offender Program "Operation Boo". Specifically a mandate to post a sign that reads “We do not participate in trick or treating” saying the requirement is unconstitutional and makes the parolee a target. On Monday a Federal judge agreed.
Halloween is around the corne and the Bledsoe family says it is a fun time to dress up and go door to door looking for candy.
“A little penguin and she wasn’t born yet…” Said mother of two Ashley Bledsoe.
But while they are thinking about the goodies and costumes, law enforcement is concerned about preventing the real life monsters from taking part in the annual trick or treat tradition.
For that reason, The California Department Of Corrections has had its long running Halloween safety sex offender program called “Operation Boo”. The
Bledsoe family say it’s a great program.
“Absolutely, I think the more information you have the better you can safeguard your children,” said Ashley Bledsoe.
But attorney and activist, Janice Bellucci along with her colleague attorney Chance Oberstein challenged one of the program’s requirements.
Both say the CDCR’s program is fine overall, but they object to the sign requirement which they argue is unconstitutional and puts the parolee in danger. On Monday a federal judge agreed with them. “It makes them sitting ducks really.” Said Bellucci.
Bellucci filed the suit after she says her client, a registered sex offender in Chula Vista, was told to post a flier on his home on Halloween saying, "We do not participate in trick or treating."
“Of all days during the year to put a sign on the door, this is when people are normally out creating mischief but sometimes it gets worse than mischief. It gets more dangerous than mischief. So unfortunately we’ve had registered citizens who’ve been murdered for no other reason because they’re on the sex offender registry.” Said the founder of California Reform Sex Offender Laws, Janice Bellucci.
According to the "Operation Boo" website, requirements for sex offender parolees include a 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. curfew on Halloween. Their lights must be off so they don't attract children, and they can’t put up decorations or even open their door except to law enforcement. However, the site makes no mention of having to post the sign.
But the Bledsoes disagree saying the judge’s decision is not in anyone’s best interest. Brian Bledsoe who is the father of two girls is upset at what he calls the sex offenders victory. “I mean you have to protect your children, and if that makes you a target you shouldn’t have committed the crime to start with. I mean you’re on the list for a reason.”
The judges decision leaves all the other requirements of Operation Boo in place but puts a temporary restraining order on the Department of Corrections so they can’t levy the sign requirement on any registered citizen this Halloween.
FOX 5 reached out to the department of corrections and did not get a response. by Maria Arcega-Dunn
October 15, 2015
Lawsuit Challenges CDCR's Halloween Sex Offender Policy
see also: Sex Offender Says Making Him Post Warning Signs on Halloween Violates His Rights10-15-15 California:
UPDATED 10-26: HALLOWEEN SEX OFFENDER LAW HEARING TO BE HELD OCT 26 (Press Release)
California’s “Operation Boo,” the state Corrections Department program that requires registered sex offenders to post signs on their front doors on Halloween, is being challenged in court.
The suit was filed by an advocacy group called California Reform Sex Offender Laws, which argues that Operation Boo makes registered sex offenders “sitting ducks” for predators.
“There are zero reported sexual assaults of children while trick-or-treating in California – zero,” says attorney Janice Bellucci, the group’s president, who's seeking a temporary restraining order before this year’s Halloween. ”So as far as we can tell, this is a solution without a problem.”
Bellucci says the state is applying the sign requirement to all sex offenders – even those whose victims weren’t children, and even if their crimes weren’t recent. The plaintiff in the suit is a registered San Diego County sex offender who committed his offense against an adult 30 years ago. He’s on parole now for a drug conviction.
The Corrections Department says it has yet to be served with the suit and therefore has no comment. ..Source.. by Ben Adler
CDCR Lawsuit Expanded, TRO Hearing Set October 26
A lawsuit challenging CDCR’s requirement that registered citizens post signs on the front door of their residences on Halloween has been expanded to include an individual in Los Angeles. Similar to the original plaintiff in the case who lives in San Diego County, the man in L.A. was told by his parole officer that he must post a sign on the front door of his home.
“Both plaintiffs believe their lives will be in danger if they post a sign on the front door of their homes,” stated CA RSOL president Janice Bellucci. “They also fear that members of their family could be harmed.”
The lawsuit, as amended on Oct. 19, alleges that CDCR is levying the sign requirement against registered citizens on parole as a blanket restriction regardless of when they were convicted, whether their offense involved a minor and their risk of re-offense. According to Dr. Karl Hanson, a PhD psychologist who has conducted re-offense research for decades, an individual convicted of a sex offense is very unlikely to commit another offense if he has not done so within 17 years.
“We have recently learned that in the recent past CDCR required registered citizens who were homeless to post Halloween signs on their sleeping bags, tents, vehicles and hotel rooms,” stated Bellucci.
According to PhD sociologist and author Emily Horowitz, “There is no research that sex offenses increase on Halloween, no evidence that sex offenders target children on Halloween and, in fact, no evidence that a child has ever been a victim of sexual abuse by a stranger while out trick-or-treating.”
An application for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) was filed in this case on Oct. 15. CDCR must respond to the TRO application by Oct. 21 and the plaintiffs may reply to that response on Oct. 22. A hearing on the TRO application is scheduled in San Diego for Oct. 26. by CA-RSOL
October 29, 2012
Judge temporarily blocks part of Simi Valley Halloween sex offender law
10-29-2012 California:
A federal judge Monday temporarily blocked enforcement of a key provision of Simi Valley's new Halloween sex offender law but left the rest of the ordinance intact.
U.S. District Judge Percy Anderson's ruling came days before the holiday on Wednesday.
Anderson temporarily blocked the city from requiring its several dozen convicted child sex offenders listed on the Megan's Law website to post signs on their front doors on Halloween saying: "No candy or treats at this residence."
But Anderson let stand requirements that the offenders refrain from opening their doors to trick-or-treating children and decorating the outside of their homes or front lawns with Halloween ornaments. The convicts also must turn off outdoor lighting on their properties from 5 p.m. to midnight Wednesday.
Attorney Janice Bellucci, who last month filed a lawsuit saying the law was unconstitutional, said she was pleased with the ruling even though she had sought to have enforcement of the entire ordinance temporarily blocked pending the outcome of the lawsuit.
Simi Valley City Attorney Marjorie Baxter said the ruling was "a big victory on the majority of the ordinance."
The Simi Valley City Council on Sept. 10 enacted the law — the only one of its kind in Ventura County — to try to prevent sex offenders from having contact with trick-or-treating children. It was championed by Mayor Bob Huber, a lawyer who is seeking re-election Nov. 6.
Bellucci, president of the board of a group called California Reform Sex Offender Laws, filed the suit Sept. 28 on behalf of five registered sex offenders, three of their spouses and two of their children, all Simi Valley residents. It says the law violates the First and 14th Amendments of the Constitution because it "suppresses and unduly chills protected speech and expression."
Private attorneys representing the city in the lawsuit disagree.
"Convicted child molesters have no constitutionally protected right to hand out candy at Halloween," they said in court papers. "Children, on the other hand, do have a constitutionally protected right to be safe from sexual assault."
Opponents of the ordinance say there are no reported instances of a trick-or-treating child being molested on Halloween. But according to Ventura Superior Court documents, one of Simi Valley's Megan's Law registrants was convicted of exposing himself to six people at a Thousand Oaks home on Halloween in 2010 while dressed as a woman. It is unclear whether the victims included children, but the man has a separate child molestation conviction.
A hearing on the city's motion to dismiss the lawsuit is scheduled for Nov. 26. ..Source.. by Mike Harris



