Never forget those who have died because of various sex offender laws.
Showing posts with label (. SORNA - States in Compliance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label (. SORNA - States in Compliance. Show all posts

December 13, 2011

RELEASE: Omaha Tribe Implements Sex Offender Registry

As of today there is no announcement from the SMART Office
12-13-2011 Nebraska:

(Macy, NE) – The U.S. Department of Justice’s SMART Office has notified the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska that it is officially “in substantial compliance with” the requirements of the federal Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”). In doing so, the Omaha Tribe has taken on the responsibility for enforcement of sex offender laws on the Omaha Indian Reservation, which will be conducted by local law enforcement.

The Omaha Tribe took on the responsibility of SORNA enforcement as an expression of its tribal sovereignty and as a service to its tribal members, who know that local law enforcement is uniquely and ideally qualified to enforce sex offender laws on the Reservation.

In meeting the requirements for an official declaration of substantial compliance, a key milestone in the movement towards a national registry, tribal law enforcement worked in collaboration with other Native American tribal members and staff, as well as state law enforcement.

The Omaha Tribe’s implementation of SORNA increases protection for those who reside on the reservation. There was virtually no controversy or opposition connected with this project, which was in operation prior to the official declaration of compliance by the Department of Justice. The Omaha Tribe’s sex offender registry can be accessed at omaha.nsopw.gov. ..Source.. by Ben Thompson

Read More of Article...

August 1, 2011

CNMI SORNA laws now in compliance with DOJ guidelines

While they claim to be in "Substantial Compliance" until the SMART Office announces it, they are not!
8-1-2011 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands:

Acting governor Eloy S. Inos on Friday signed into law a House bill that seeks to re-enact the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws to comply with the U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines.

Inos immediately notified Senate President Paul A. Manglona (R-Tinian) and House Speaker Eliceo D. Cabrera (R-Saipan) about the signing of House Bill 17-111, which becomes Public Law 17-49.

Introduced by Rep. Joseph M. Palacios (R-Saipan) and Cabrera, the bill passed the House and the Senate on first and final reading on July 15, 2011 and July 28, 2011, respectively.

The Legislature in passing the bill underscored the importance for the CNMI's current registration law to meet the minimum mandatory requirements of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 known as Sex Offender Registration Notification Act (SORNA).

In July 2006, U.S. President Bush signed into law SORNA, which established a comprehensive national system for registration of sex offenders.

SORNA requires each territory to implement the provisions of the Act.

The Legislature said repealing and re-enacting P.L. 11-104 (Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws) is crucial to meeting SORNA minimum requirements and, more so, safeguarding the community.

The Legislature said SORNA will augment the ability of law enforcement agencies responsible with registration within the CNMI and other jurisdiction to track, monitor and communicate with each other regarding sex offenders who abscond and/or cross state lines.

Chief parole officer Joseph Guerrero in an interview with the Saipan Tribune on Friday that with the signing of House Bill 17-111 into law, the CNMI is now joining all the U.S. states and territories in compliance with the U.S. Department of Justice guidelines.

“ If we do not become a part of this group in passing this bill into law, we will be losing 10 percent of all federal money. So this was the intricate part of getting this bill passed and signed by the acting governor,” Guerrero said.

He said they have been working for this legislation for a number of years, and it became a reality on Friday.

Guerrero said the working group composed of the Probation Office, the Office of the Attorney General, the Department of Public Safety, and the Board of Parole have worked together to make the law a reality.

“This is technically for the community. To protect the community from sex offenders as well as to make the community aware of where these sex offenders are residing,” the chief parole officer said. ..Source.. by Ferdie de la Torre
Reporter

Read More of Article...

July 29, 2011

Did Georgia Meet Sex Offender Registry Deadline? Thousands of Federal Dollars Could Be At Stake

7-29-2011 Georgia:

It remains a mystery whether Georgia met a critical deadline this week to comply with a federal ruling known as the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006.

“We can’t say for sure at this point, we have packets arriving in droves,” said United States Department of Justice (DOJ) Spokeswoman Kara McCarthy. “It may take up to three months for us to go through all of the packets we have received.”

Wednesday was the deadline for the peach state and more than 30 others to implement the federal mandate that requires states to establish a sex offender registry for adults and juveniles that connects with a national registry.

“To date, 14 states, nine tribes and one territory have substantially implemented Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) requirements,” said Linda Baldwin, Director of DOJ’s Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART) Office, which administers SORNA. “We are reviewing as quickly as possible the materials submitted.”

DOJ has confirmed that Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, Ohio, South Carolina, South Dakota and Wyoming have substantially implemented SORNA, along with nine native American tribes and the U.S. territory of Guam.

States, tribes and territories that did not meet DOJ’s deadline this week will be denied different amounts of government funding for the year. The Walsh Act specifies that those that failed to substantially implement SORNA by the deadline would be subject to a 10 percent reduction in amount awarded to the jurisdiction under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) program. Jurisdictions often use these formula grants to improve state and local criminal justice programs with an emphasis on violent crime and serious offenders. The Act also permits states and territories to potentially recoup the 10 percent reduction in a future fiscal year if it is demonstrated that these funds will be used to implement SORNA programs. Sources tell JJIE.org that $750,000, or 10 percent of the estimated $7.5 million of the JAG money allotted to Georgia this fiscal year could be at stake.

Sources with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Coordinating Council (CJCC) and Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ) have declined comment on the matter, with the latter deferring to a response from Gov. Nathan Deal’s office. “We’re awaiting a response from the governor’s office, DJJ spokeswoman Scheree Moore said. “We can’t comment until we hear back from them.”

CJCC Executive Director Barbara Lynn Howell did not immediately reply to requests for interviews, but indicated earlier this week by telephone that state officials had been assessing the cost of implementing the registry system versus the potential penalties faced for compliance failure. Sources close to JJIE.org have confirmed that the price tag for implementing the system could cost more than the revenue lost.

At issue also are concerns about whether juveniles should be required to be on a registry list at all. In fact, a document published as part of DOJ’s testimony in a hearing on the Walsh Act indicated that several states cited “juvenile requirements” as a barrier to complying with the Act.

SORNA sets minimum requirements for who to include on the registry and how long to include them. SORNA mandates that certain juvenile sex offenders be included, although a supplemental guideline issued by DOJ permits states to keep juvenile registrants on a non-public list.

Supporters of the sex offender registry legislation argue that non-compliance allows “dangerous” sex offenders to find the gaps and move around accordingly. Critics, however, believe that the danger in non-compliant jurisdictions is exaggerated. During an interview for an unrelated article earlier this week former DJJ Commissioner Garland Hunt affirmed that he believes both sides have strong arguments.

“I’m not sure the stance that the governor and DJJ are taking on that, so I prefer not to comment on that in particular,” he said. “But, I will say with sex offenders you have got to be very careful. You don’t want to stain somebody for life, so I think it should be looked at on a case-by-case basis. However, public safety is a great issue. If it’s determined that [a juvenile be listed on a registry] is what’s best for public safety, that has to be a priority.”

This week’s July deadline was the third in the slow move toward Walsh Act compliance. All states were granted a blanket extension by Attorney General Eric Holder in July of 2009. States were allowed to ask individually for extensions in 2010, and all but the initial four compliant states received one. JJIE.org will continue to update you as our request for interviews and requests are met. ..Source.. by Chandra R. Thomas

Read More of Article...

July 27, 2011

Kansas sex offender registry meets national standards

7-27-2011 Kansas:

The U.S. Department of Justice has approved recent upgrades to the Kansas sex offender online registry, Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt announced Wednesday

The Justice Department’s Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking this week notified Schmidt that they have reviewed Kansas’ updated offender registry laws and have determined the state has “substantially implemented the provisions of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA).” SORNA was enacted by Congress in 2006 as part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act. Kansas is the 10th state to achieve substantial compliance with SORNA.

“This announcement is great news for Kansas,” Schmidt said. “Kansas will be safer as a result of changes to the offender registry that were enacted this year, and it’s now clear we will be doing our part among all the states in implementing the national standards for registering sex offenders and getting information out to the public.”

As a result of the federal approval of the new Kansas laws, Kansas will remain eligible for its full share of federal public safety grant money. If Kansas hadn’t changed its law to comply with federal requirements, it would have been subject to a reduction in federal grant funding as a penalty.

The new law will require offenders to register more frequently. It also shortens the amount of time allowed for offenders to re-register after moving to a new address, increases the length of time some offenders remain on the registry, and increases penalties for repeatedly failing to register. The Kansas Bureau of Investigation’s Offender Registration Unit maintains the online registry and was tasked with implementing the new law. ..Source.. by The Capital-Journal

Read More of Article...

The Adam Walsh Act: States in "Substantial Compliance" very low ?

Please notice: SMART stands for the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering and Tracking. Folks this office has nothing to do with "Sentencing," Yet?

UPDATE 7-29-2011 From another news article, as to how many are NOT in compliance: “We can’t say for sure at this point, we have packets arriving in droves,” said United States Department of Justice (DOJ) Spokeswoman Kara McCarthy. “It may take up to three months for us to go through all of the packets we have received.” .
7-27-2011 SMART Office:

The SMART Office has been quiet for some time on states coming into compliance. Personally I think this is a testament to states not wanting federal control over their legislature, but I could be wrong. However, what other reason would they use to STOP posting states coming into compliance? Maybe they don't want folks to know what a failure AWA is? Who knows.

But, the SMART Office has been posting a few new ones on their website "Newsroom" which cannot be accessed by its URL. Yes, I said cannot be accessed by its URL. What you must do is CLICK on their SITE INDEX, then CLICK on NEWSROOM.

Finally, as states are posted we will review them for compliance with the AWA portion that is relevant to the safety of registrants and their families. See here

17 States in Compliance: Alabama; Colorado; Delaware; Florida; Kansas; Louisiana; Maryland; Michigan; Mississippi; Missouri; Nevada; Ohio; Pennsylvania; South Carolina; South Dakota; Tennessee; Wyoming.

States Refusing to Comply w/source links: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Indiana, Montana, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Texas, West Virginia. Note: We are told North Dakota has also refused but cannot find any source document to link to. And, since Lawmakers change over time, the next legislature may change their mind as to coming into compliance, so these may have changed since the source we linked to.

Territories in Compliance: Guam; Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; U.S. Virgin Islands

Keep checking back for further updates:

LAST CHECKED:
Today 8-21-2014:
Jurisdictions that have substantially implemented SORNA 17 states, three territories, and 70 tribes.


SORNA Extensions Granted 8-2-2010

Read More of Article...

July 11, 2011

D.C. won't meet federal sex offender registry mandate

7-11-2011 Washington DC:

The District will not meet a July 27 deadline to fall in line with a federal mandate designed to create a national sex offender registry, likely causing the city to lose $250,000 in grant money that it uses for crime prevention.

If the city continues not to act, it could stand to lose about $1 million from the feds over the next four years. Tuesday is the last chance before the deadline for the council to act on legislation introduced by the mayor in May that's designed to bring the District into compliance with the five-year-old Adam Walsh Act. After Tuesday, the council won't meet again to vote on legislation until mid-September.

At-large Councilman Phil Mendelson, who is handling the mayor's bill as head of the public safety committee, told The Washington Examiner that he's not rushing.

"We'll continue to look at the legislation over the next couple of months," Mendelson said. "We need to look beyond the deadline and at what's the right policy."

The District won't likely be the only jurisdiction not to meet the deadline for the controversial federal requirements, which include tracking for at least 25 years on a nonpublic sex offender registry youths as young as 14 who are convicted of violent rapes. Only seven states are in compliance with the act, although many -- including Virginia -- are working closely with federal officials to meet the deadline. Some states, such as Maryland, aren't interested in changing how they handle juvenile sex offenders.

There's also the issue of cost.

Earlier this month, the District's chief financial officer determined that implementing the legislation would cost more than $700,000 in the first year, and $78,000 for every year that follows.

The city's "funds are not sufficient" to make the legislation a reality, the CFO wrote to the council. The CFO's assessment also confirmed the city would lose the federal grant money, which in the past has been doled out to groups such as the gang-fighting nonprofit group Peaceoholics.

Beyond the cash, there's also the potential cost of having sex offender laws that are less rigourous than other states, police union chief Kris Baumann said.

"It's a small price to pay for us not to become a haven for sex offenders," Baumann said.

Mendelson said that won't happen.

"My impression is that our current law is pretty good and this is about closing a few details," Mendelson said. ..Source.. by : Freeman Klopott

Read More of Article...

May 13, 2011

Justice Department Announces Four More Jurisdictions Implement Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act

Unfortunately more states succumb to denying registrants rights and destroys their families. All for the sake of MONEY and Political gain.
5-13-2011 National:

WASHINGTON, May 12, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Department of Justice today announced that Michigan, Nevada, Wyoming, and the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians in Michigan have substantially implemented the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), Title I of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. These four jurisdictions, along with Ohio, Delaware, South Dakota, Florida, Guam, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation, have substantially implemented SORNA.

"We are pleased four more jurisdictions have substantially implemented this important legislation," said Linda Baldwin, Director of the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART). "We are aggressively working with the remaining states, tribes and territories on their implementation efforts before the July 27 deadline."

"Achieving substantial implementation of SORNA is the culmination of substantial efforts put forth by many people in the Wyoming government since 2007," said Kevin R. Smith, Deputy Director of Wyoming's CJIS. "This work has been and continues to be conducted with the vision to protect Wyoming communities. We are pleased to finally meet SORNA requirements."

Derek J. Bailey, Tribal Chairman, Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, said, "The Grand Traverse Band is committed to the safety and well being of its citizenship, and through acquiring SORNA Substantial Compliance, the Tribe has progressed a further step in making our communities a safer place for individuals and families."

Under Federal law, states failing to implement SORNA by July 27, 2011, will be subjected to a ten percent reduction in Byrne Justice Assistance Grant funding.

The Office of Justice Programs (OJP), headed by Assistant Attorney General Laurie O. Robinson, provides federal leadership in developing the nation's capacity to prevent and control crime, administer justice, and assist victims. OJP has seven bureaus and offices: the Bureau of Justice Assistance; the Bureau of Justice Statistics; the National Institute of Justice; the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention; the Office for Victims of Crime; the Community Capacity Development Office, and the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART). More information about OJP and its components can be found at http://www.ojp.gov. ..Source.. by DOJ Press Release

Read More of Article...

April 17, 2011

Sex law change too late for some

4-17-2011 Michigan:

Justin Fawcett was only 20 when his parents found him dead of an overdose in his bedroom at their West Bloomfield home.

But David and Gayle Fawcett believe that, in his own mind, their son's life had ended a month earlier, when Justin's probation officer told him he'd likely spend the next 25 years on Michigan's public sex offender registry for a consensual relationship he'd had years earlier with a 14-year-old classmate at Bloomfield Hills' Andover High School.

"He had a lot of stuff going on," Gayle Fawcett says, "but finding out he was going to be on the registry for a couple of decades did him in."

David Fawcett, who worried about his son's despondency in an e-mail he sent me two weeks before Justin's death, begged his boy to take the long view.

"I told him that people were working to change the law, and that someday they would," recalled David, who would later join a group of parents seeking such changes and testify before the state Legislature about his son's ordeal. "But he didn't believe me."

Mark of shame

Last week, a little more than seven years after Justin Fawcett's death, Gov. Rick Snyder signed into law a series of bills that will allow some teenagers prosecuted for their involvement in so-called Romeo and Juliet cases like Fawcett's to escape the humiliating and life-stunting stigmatization that stalks those listed on Michigan's sex offender registry.

The changes will place those convicted of committing sexual offenses when they were younger than 17 on a nonpublic list available only to police. They will also allow some older offenders -- especially those who can satisfy the court that their underage sex partners were not coerced -- to be removed from the list, or escape registration altogether.

Some of those who may benefit have already spent years on the public registry.

Cheryl Carpenter, an Oakland County attorney who has represented dozens of juvenile offenders, is planning to petition the court on behalf of one client who ended up on the registry after he signed the birth certificate of the daughter he fathered with his then-15-year-old girlfriend.

Years later, after the father and his no-longer-underage partner married and had a second child, their first daughter was embarrassed when a teacher warning her class about sexual predators punched the school's ZIP code into the online sex offender registry and her dad's name came up.

"Her parents had told her her dad was on the registry," Carpenter recalled, "but it wasn't something the whole class knew, until then."

Attorneys say the legislation Snyder signed may help hundreds or even thousands of the state's 45,000 sex offenders escape a mark of shame that thwarts their efforts to find a job, rent an apartment or change their addresses without risking a reporting violation that could land them behind bars.

But the new law, adopted by overwhelming bipartisan majorities in both houses, may extend and even exacerbate the price paid by many others convicted of nonviolent sex offenses.

Adopted to assure that the state remains eligible for millions of dollars in federal money that was made contingent on states following registration standards dictated by Congress, Michigan's law will also now require registrants to disclose online where they are employed -- a new requirement that will make finding work even more difficult for those whose sexual offenses are ancient history. Offenders will also have to disclose their e-mail addresses, passport numbers and vehicles, and face arrest if they fail to report any changes to police within three days.

Some teen sex offenders may also continue to face the threat of registration if they commit other, nonsexual offenses, as Justin Fawcett did after pleading guilty in the Bloomfield case.

"I'm not at all sure this law would have helped someone in his circumstances," David Fawcett conceded in an interview Friday.

The sex diary case

Like virtually every terrified parent I've interviewed since writing my first column about the subject in 1998, David Fawcett was stunned to learn that his son's trysts with another high school student placed Justin in jeopardy of being listed on the sex offender registry alongside violent rapists and serial child predators.

"I knew what statutory rape was," he said, recalling Valentine's Day in 2002, when a lawyer friend called to say their son had been arrested. "But I assumed that you could walk into court with the girl, and if she said it was consensual, they would slap you on the wrist. I didn't know it was something that could brand a teenager for decades."

To make matters worse, the case in which Justin was charged was attended by extraordinary publicity.

Launched when the parents of the 14-year-old Andover girl provided prosecutors with a diary recounting their daughter's encounters with as many as 22 partners, many of them fellow students, the case eventually yielded felony criminal sexual conduct charges against Justin and four other males. All but one of them had been teenagers themselves when they got involved with the girl.

Then-Oakland County Prosecutor David Gorcyca fought to withhold the girl's diary from the defendants' attorneys, but Bloomfield Hills District Judge Kimberly Small ultimately ordered its release. In the diary and a subsequent interview with the Free Press, the 14-year-old speculated that she herself had been "the predator," pursuing young men "who themselves were victims of misplaced confidence."

After a front-page Free Press story detailing the circumstances of the case, Gorcyca agreed to drop sexual misconduct charges against the four Bloomfield students. The fifth and oldest defendant fled to his native Mexico. All four eventually received probationary sentences after pleading guilty to reduced charges of seduction. The plea agreements were designed to keep them off the sex offender registry and won court approval with the blessing of the 14-year-old diarist and her family.

"Nobody wanted to see these young kids stigmatized for life," Meyer Morganroth, the girl's attorney, told me then.

But in 2003, then-state Attorney General Mike Cox told county prosecutors a recent appellate court ruling appeared to require that defendants convicted of any crime "that by its nature suggests a sexual offense against an individual who is less than 18 years of age" had to go on the registry. Early the next year, all four of the Bloomfield sex diary defendants were told they'd be placed on the public list, notwithstanding the terms of their plea agreements.

'A year in jail was nothing'

Justin Fawcett's codefendants had avoided further legal trouble since their CSC arrests, and all three were eventually allowed to withdraw their original pleas and make new deals that kept them off the registry.

But Justin, who had experimented with drugs before the sex diaries ordeal and developed an addiction to painkillers, was arrested on new charges stemming from his efforts to secure prescription drugs illegally. In 2003, after falling behind on his court fee payments and getting arrested for larceny from a vehicle, he spent several months in the Oakland County Jail.

David Fawcett hoped his son's time in jail would "wake him up" -- and for a time after his release on the last day of 2003, it seemed that it had.

Justin enrolled at Oakland Community College, where he carried a 4.0 average and earned praise from the dean of student affairs. He attended Narcotics Anonymous meetings and seemed committed to his sobriety.

Then came the news that he would go on the sex offender registry.

"A year in jail was nothing compared to 25 years on the registry," David Fawcett reflected Friday. "He thought his life was ruined."

"When he came back from that meeting with his probation officer, he was defeated," Gayle Fawcett agreed. "That's when he started doing bad things again, and he just gave up."

I'm not sure which is more horrible -- the thought that young Justin Fawcett might be alive if the law signed last week had been enacted seven years earlier, or my suspicion that other teens in similar circumstances will continue to bear the stigma of "registered sexual offender" into middle age and beyond.

"We had another attempted suicide last Friday," reported Barbara Lambourne, a Michigan activist whose Citizens for Second Chances counsels and lobbies on behalf of registered offenders and their families.

In the latest case, she said, an 18-year-old tried to hang himself after his conviction for having sex with an underage girlfriend.

Lambourne suspects the 18-year-old may be eligible under the new law for removal from the registry -- if he recovers.

"In some respects, it's a good start," she said, "but we're getting a lot of panicked calls from people who are afraid the new reporting requirements are going to cost them their jobs."

Michigan already lists more people on its sex offender registry than all but three other states. We needn't condone youthful promiscuity or jettison the legal age of consent to recognize that many who were sexually irresponsible in their youth pose no enduring threat to society.

The branding of teens and older offenders who pose no continuing threat to the public betrays not only our archaic hypocrisy about teenage sex, but also our devaluation of teenage lives. Michigan legislators have begun to take baby steps in the right direction -- but their work is far from done. ..Source.. by Contact Brian Dickerson: 313-222-6584 or bdickerson@freepress.com

Read More of Article...

February 25, 2011

21 States Say Including Juveniles Is a Barrier on Walsh Act Compliance

2-25-2011 National:

Nearly half of the states who have not met federal requirements for their sex offender registries have a problem with the mandate that registries include juveniles.

A document published as part of Justice Department testimony in a hearing on the Adam Walsh Act of 2006 last week indicates 21 states cite “juvenile requirements” as a barrier to complying with the act, which among other things requires states to establish a sex offender registry that connects with a national registry.

That aspect of the law, called the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), sets minimum requirements for who to include on the registry and how long to include them. SORNA mandates that certain juvenile sex offenders be included, although a supplemental guideline issued last month by the Justice Department permits states to keep juvenile registrants on a non-public list.

“Significant clarifications were made” in the guidelines that “make compliance very, very possible,” said Patricia Colloton, a state representative from Kansas, in her testimony to the House Committee on the Judiciary on Feb. 15.

This is particularly true for states where concerns center on juveniles, she said. “Both sides of the aisle” oppose inclusion of most juveniles because they’re “less likely to re-offend.”

July 10 is the deadline to comply with the Walsh Act or incur a 10 percent cut to the state’s Justice Assistance Grant for state and local law enforcement. Florida, Delaware, Ohio and South Dakota are the only states that are currently compliant with the law.

The hearing revealed that nobody expects the majority of states to be substantially compliant by the deadline this summer, and that some may not be ready for another two years, if they comply at all.

The Justice Department is “reasonably confident” that between 10 and 15 states will comply with the Walsh Act by the July deadline, said Dawn Doran, deputy director of the Justice Department’s Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART) Office. The remaining 25 to 30 states “may or may not” meet the deadline.

“I’m not pleased with the rate of compliance,” said Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Ohio). “I intend to see it is fully implemented.”

Sensenbrenner asked Colloton how long she thought most states would need to comply.

“Two more years,” Colloton said, citing three reasons: the initial SORNA regulations were not published until 2008, that new guidelines had been issued one month ago and a number of state legislatures meet for a short period each year.

Sensenbrenner asked another witness – Ernie Allen, CEO of the National Center on Missing and Exploited Children – what he thought of the deadline.

“It’s a balancing act here,” Allen said. “I certainly agree [with Colloton] that effectively, states have only have had three years to come into compliance.”

But, Allen said, “I fear if [a 2-year extension] is provided, states will just delay. I don’t think that’s unheard of.”

Sensenbrenner hinted that he may personally come down on the side of granting extensions based on direct appeals from states, though not for two more years.

“I believe in deadlines,” he said. “Excuses [for extensions] are going to have to be valid. I really don’t think two years is appropriate. I have a feeling people won’t get worried about this until 2013.”

Rep. Bobby Scott (D-Va.), who philosophically opposed the act when it was originally proposed, expressed questions as to whether the act was something states would ever accept.

“SORNA is proving unworkable,” Scott said. “Even among the few states with SORNA compliance, there are problems.”

The July deadline is the third in the slow move toward Walsh Act compliance. All states were granted a blanket extension by Attorney General Eric Holder in July of 2009. States were allowed to ask individually for extensions in 2010, and all but the four compliant states received one.

Even this year’s deadline is not completely firm. A state can apply to receive the funds it would lose, but only if the money is used for purposes related to becoming Walsh Act compliant.

Justice has given grants to 44 states to assist them in implementing the Walsh Act. Last month, on the heels of the new supplemental guidelines, the department hosted a workshop on the act in Washington. ..Source.. by John Kelly, Youth Today

Read More of Article...

January 21, 2011

Justice Department Announces Seventh Jurisdiction to Implement Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act

Guam's registry was virtually non existent before this, so anyone claiming a ex post facto violation (Guam has such a clause in their Constitution) will have to go to court and file a action. Note: Comment "Substantially Implemented" not "In Compliance" makes one wonder if there is a distinction?

Also note, more federal staff added to follow a useless law! (A phone book w/pics that tells nothing more than where registrants SLEEP for a few hours of the day. The word TRACKING is perverted by lawmakers.) Assigned Tiers are a farce, logical when crime was committed, but not logical in Today's Light!

UPDATE: "Compliance" is a yearly procedure that states must go through to remain "In Compliance." Given the outcome of the Ohio lawsuits,it is possible they are "Out of Compliance" today, but it will not show until their next "Compliance Check."
1-21-2011 Washington DC:

WASHINGTON, Jan. 20, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Department of Justice today announced that the U.S. Territory of Guam has substantially implemented the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), Title I of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. Guam joins the States of Ohio, Delaware, South Dakota, and Florida, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation as jurisdictions that have substantially implemented SORNA.

"We are pleased to announce that Guam has substantially implemented this important legislation," said Linda Baldwin, Director of the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART). "We are committed to working with the remaining states, tribes and territories on their implementation efforts."

Guam has been actively working with the Office of Justice Programs' SMART Office to meet the requirements of SORNA. The SMART Office has added staff, increased outreach efforts, developed resources and issued documents to provide further definition, guidance, and direction to SORNA jurisdictions.

"We are extremely pleased to learn that Guam recently became the seventh jurisdiction nationwide and the first U.S. Territory to substantially implement the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA)," said Guam Attorney General Leonardo M. Rapadas. "Our partners, the Guam Legislature, Judiciary, law enforcement, other stakeholders … worked extremely hard on this important issue to protect our people. Guam will not become a hiding place for convicted sexual offenders and child molesters.'" ..Source.. by DOJ and the SMART Office

Read More of Article...

September 10, 2010

South Dakota Sex Offender Registry Achieves National Certification

9-10-2010 Washington DC:

PIERRE, S.D.- Attorney General Marty Jackley announces that South Dakota's Sex Offender Registry has become the fourth registry in the nation to be certified. The Department of Justice has determined that South Dakota has substantially implemented the provisions of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA).

Sex offender registration and community notification is an important part of a nationwide commitment to improving the safety of our communities. There are a total of 248 Sex Offender Registration Jurisdictions. Only South Dakota, Florida, Ohio, and Delaware registries have met the national SORNA certification requirements. This certification further ensures that thousands of federal dollars will not be withheld from South Dakota.

"Sex Offender Registries are intended to protect our children and communities, and South Dakota's registry has now been rightfully recognized as one of the strongest in the nation," stated Attorney General Jackley. "I commend our Legislature for improving South Dakota's registry, and law enforcement for its efforts to implement and enforce our registration requirements." ..Source.. by South Dakota Attorney General's Office

Read More of Article...