Never forget those who have died because of various sex offender laws.
Showing posts with label .Alabama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label .Alabama. Show all posts

October 23, 2015

Appeals judge: Descriptions of sex crimes too graphic in court ruling upholding conviction

10-23-15 Alabama:

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama — An Alabama judge says colleagues on a state appeals court included too much graphic detail about a sex abuse and sodomy case in a written opinion upholding a man's convictions.

Judge Michael Joiner agreed Friday with three peers on the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals who upheld William Brownlee's convictions on the charges. Brownlee is serving 20 years in prison after being convicted of repeatedly molesting an underage girl.

But Joiner took issue with the graphic nature of the wording the judges used to describe the crimes.

Joiner says he doesn't mean Brownlee's crimes should be ignored or covered up. But he says courts must use discretion, because written opinions are more available to the public than ever.

Brownlee was accused of being part of a large group of adults who molested children and swapped their own kids for sex for years. ..Source.. by JAY REEVES

Read More of Article...

August 26, 2015

Alabama Sex Offender Law Challenged

8-26-15 Alabama:

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (CN) - Sex offenders living in Alabama are being forced to comply with a debilitating set of restrictions that encompasses "virtually every facet of their lives," a group of registrants claims in court.

Eight John Doe plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit last week against Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange III and Secretary of the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency John Richardson in Federal Court.

The Aug. 20 complaint seeks court relief to prevent application of the Alabama Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act, or ASORCNA, claiming the law is unconstitutional.

The lawsuit argues that the act violates due process by denying sex offender registrants certain fundamental rights. It also claims that the law is vague and should be declared void.

"The plaintiffs ask this court to recognize what other courts across the country have increasingly found: that the nature of sex offender registration has fundamentally changed since 2003, when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a registration scheme that imposed registration and Internet notification only with effects that were 'minor and indirect' restraints on registrants," the complaint states.

Alabama first passed a sex offender registration law in 1967, according to the complaint. The law at the time called for a one-time registration with the sheriff of the offender's home county, and the registration information was only available to law enforcement.

The state passed its Community Notification Act in 1996, which "was not retroactively applied, and required only written notification upon an offenders change in address," as opposed to in-person registration, the complaint states.

And in 2011, Alabama passed the current version of its sex offender law, which is retroactively applied to all adult sex offenders in the state and requires quarterly, in-person registration.

The law places restrictions on where registered sex offenders are allowed to live and work and "requires the distribution of community-notification flyers to those living near a registrant's residence," according to the complaint. It also requires registrants to carry a driver's license or ID card that "enables law enforcement officers to identify the licensee as a sex offender."

In addition, registered sex offenders are required to report their travel plans whenever they intend to be away from their home county for three or more consecutive days, the lawsuit states.

"ASORCNA violates the plaintiffs' fundamental rights to travel, to work, to speak and to be free from arbitrary and oppressive laws without being lawfully tailored in a manner to meet Alabama's interest," the complaint states.

The law's provisions are applied "for life and without regard to the nature of the offense, the age of the victim, or the passage of time since the underlying sex offense," according to the complaint.

The anonymous plaintiffs claim Alabama imposes an unprecedented number of "obligations, disabilities, and restraints" on registered sex offenders, making its law the most restrictive of its kind in the country.

"ASORCNA severely limits registrants' ability to: maintain intimate associations with family; find housing and employment; travel; engage in free speech activities or refrain from speaking; be free from shame, embarrassment, humiliation and stigma; and understand what is required of them under the statute," the complaint states.

The lawsuit seeks a declaration that Alabama's current sex offender law is unconstitutional and void. The eight plaintiffs are represented by J. Mitch McGuire in Montgomery, Ala. ..Source.. by JOHN BRACKIN

Read More of Article...

August 12, 2015

14-year-old raped during botched sting can sue Madison County school board

8-12-15 Alabama:

The 14-year-old girl who was raped during a botched sting operation in a middle school bathroom in north Alabama five years ago can sue the Madison County school board in federal court for deliberate indifference to the educational opportunities of young girls.

"These are highly unique and extreme facts that will hopefully never again be repeated," wrote the appeals judges in a lengthy, complicated ruling on exactly who is liable for sending an eighth-grade girl to catch a serial sexual harasser in the act.

A teachers aide hatched the sting operation to catch the boy in the act. But teachers arrived too late. Medical records show the girl was anally raped. She withdrew from Sparkman Middle and the boy returned after a stint at the alternative school.

The resulting lawsuit against the board was thrown out by the lower court, and brought back to life today by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

"This is a unique case because the administrators effectively participated in (the boy's) sexual harassment by setting (Jane) Doe up in a rape-bait scheme involving (the boy) in order to 'catch him in the act,'" found the appeals court.

Today's ruling parsed two separate appeals and at least six different claims that had been argued before the court in Atlanta on May 19.

In the end, the court held the girl can continue to sue the Madison County school board, principal Ronnie Blair, former assistant principal Jeanne Dunaway and the former teacher's aide June Simpson in federal court.

The court did clear one assistant principal, Teresa Terrell. "Unlike Assistant Principal Dunaway and Teacher's Aide Simpson, there is no evidence Terrell acquiesced to or ratified the plan to use Doe as rape bait," wrote the court.

As for the board itself and the claims under the federal Title IX, the court writes that a jury could find unreasonable and even "patently odious" acts in regard to school policy, including the shredding of student discipline records, the assigning of disciplined students to unmonitored janitorial duty, the policy of having to catch students in the act of sexual harassment, and the lack of policy changes after this incident.

The Court notes that "the Board's knowledge of (the boy's) sexual harassment, its catch in the act policy, its orchestration of a sting operation using Doe as bait for (the boy's) sexual activities, and its failure to help Doe in any way was patently odious."

The Court cites poorly kept electronic records that prevented the board from tracking a serial offender. The Court, in particular, finds problematic the handling of the situation after the rape, from not changing the record-keeping practices to allowing the boy to return to school to not keeping records of the investigation.

"In addition, the Board made only one policy change: it discontinued a one-day sexual harassment training workshop for administrators at the Madison County Administrator Academy," reads the ruling. "Although Principal Blair believes the Board did not need to change any policies because 'we did as good a job I think as you could do under the circumstances,' a reasonable jury could disagree."

But the court rejected the more broad constitutional claims against the school board, claims involving the Equal Protection Clause, "which confers a federal constitutional right to be free from sex."

The court reasoned: "The Board could not have foreseen a rape-bait scheme that required an eighth-grade student to voluntarily subject herself to sexual harassment as a 'known or obvious consequence' of the 'catch in the act' policy or its training policies."

However, the appeals court took a different position on those same claims in regard to the individual employees. The ruling reversed the lower court and allowed constitutional claims to proceed against Blair and Dunaway, in part, the court held "because 'every objectively reasonable government official facing the circumstances' would know this irresponsible plan violated the Equal Protection Clause."

Blair did not know about the sting beforehand. But the Court writes: "The evidence shows Blair crafted and implemented Sparkman's sexual harassment and recordkeeping policies. A jury could find that despite these policies' glaring inadequacies that were exposed by (the boy's) rape of Doe, Blair did virtually nothing in response."

The ruling also addressed various claims under state law. The district judge, while throwing out all federal claims, had allowed negligence and wantoness claims to proceed against Dunaway and Simpson.

Dunaway had appealed this part of the ruling, arguing she had immunity as an agent of the state. The girl also appealed, arguing she should be able to sue Blair under state claims.

The appeals court today largely upheld those rulings. The court found that Blair did not act in self-interest and retains qualified immunity as a state agent.

But the court held that Dunaway cannot claim immunity from state claims because she "exceeded her authority by ratifying the rape-bait scheme rather than reporting CJC's sexual harassment to Principal Blair in accordance with the Policy Manual..."

But the court also touches on a key disagreement of fact, as it recounts the botched sting.

In January of 2010, teacher's aide Simpson told Blair about a rumor involving the same boy having sex in the school bathroom with another girl. Blair had investigated but said he lacked proof. Simpson said Blair told her he needed to catch students in the act. The boy was then accused of touching another girl's thigh on Jan. 13 and Blair placed the boy on janitorial duty.

The boy then began to proposition the girl for sex and had continued to do so until she complained to Simpson. On Jan. 22, Simpson suggested the sting.

From today's ruling: "Simpson said 'do you want to get (the boy)' in trouble and Doe said 'yes.' Simpson said, 'Do you want to—you have to go meet him so that we could set him up and get him caught because he's been doing this for a while.' Doe responded that she 'didn't want to go,' and walked to the locker room. Doe and her friend then sat in the locker room a few minutes and conversed. A few minutes later, Doe approached Simpson again and 'told her I would do it.' Simpson asked if Doe was 'sure,' and Doe said yes."

She took the girl to the assistant principal's office. Dunaway was on the phone with her husband.

Here they disagree. Simpson says she told Dunaway the plan and that Dunaway showed her pictures of floor tile on her cell phone. Dunaway says that Simpson did not speak to her, but stood in her office with her back to Dunaway while Dunaway was busy.

The girl withdrew from Sparkman Middle on March 26, two months after the sting, and moved to North Carolina. She is an adult now and the court allowed her to drop her father's name from the suit and proceed as Jane Doe.

Simpson no longer works for the system. She did not send an attorney to speak for her during the hearing in May before the appeals court. Dunaway became an elementary school principal and has since been moved to the central office.

The ruling notes: "The medical records from the examination were consistent with anal rape...For reasons undisclosed by the record, the Madison County District Attorney's Office never filed charges against (the boy)." ..Source.. by Challen Stephens

Read More of Article...

April 14, 2015

Alabama blogger ordered to pay $3.5 million in defamation lawsuit

4-14-15 Alabama:

A Shelby County blogger, who spent five months in jail before agreeing to remove stories from his website about the son of a former governor, has now been ordered to pay $3.5 million in a defamation lawsuit filed by a former campaign manager for Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange.

The blogger had written about an alleged affair between Strange and the campaign manager.

Jefferson County Circuit Judge Donald Blankenship on Monday entered a default judgment against Roger Shuler and his website Legal Schnauzer for $1.5 million in compensatory and $2 million in punitive damages. The judge wrote that all the elements for the judgment were present, including that a false and defamatory statement was made.

Jessica Medeiros Garrison, a Birmingham lawyer, filed the defamation lawsuit in 2013 against Shuler. She had managed Strange's 2010 campaign for Alabama Attorney General and served as Chief Counsel and Deputy Attorney General in 2011.

"The facts are clear and the judgment speaks for itself," Garrison stated in an email Tuesday to AL.com. "The absolute and blatant disregard for the truth has to come with consequences. I am very happy to finally be in a position to set the record straight," she wrote.

Bill Baxley, one of Garrison's attorneys, also said the ruling "speaks for itself." He said he doubts his client will be able to collect any money from Shuler, who had his house foreclosed upon a year or so ago. ..Continued.. by Kent Faulk

Read More of Article...

November 17, 2014

Court rules man won't have to register as sex offender

11-17-2014 Alabama:

A Muscogee County man who pled guilty to a reduced charge after he was indicted for sexually abusing a little girl in Lee County (Ala.) won't have to register as a sex offender, according to a ruling today by the Supreme Court of Georgia.

Mario Urbina, of Columbus, was teaching piano lessons in Auburn, Ala., when he allegedly lured a female child into a room at Auburn United Methodist Church. There he was accused of engaging in some kind of sexual conduct with the child, who was younger than 12 years old.

Urbina was indicted on charges of enticing a child to enter for immoral purposes and sex abuse of a child less than 12 years of age. In April 2012, Urbina pled guilty to a less serious and non-sexual offense of interference with custody, a felony in Alabama. Urbina was to serve four years in prison, but the court a month later reduced the sentence to probation, which Urbina sought to transfer to Georgia so he could return to Muscogee County with his wife and children.

Because Urbina pled guilty to a felony in Alabama, the Georgia Department of Corrections informed him he would be required to register as a sex offender. Urbina then sued the department seeking to prohibit the department from forcing him to register.

The Supreme Court's ruling upholds a Fulton County judgment that said Urbina did not have to register. While the trial court based its ruling on the distinction between a misdemeanor and a felony, the Supreme Court based its ruling on the distinction between the crime with which he was charged and the crime of which he was ultimately convicted.

"The factual basis set forth in the later information upon which Urbina was actually convicted are quite different, and it is the facts related to the conviction, not the allegations relating to the abandoned indictment, which must control our analysis," today’s opinion said. ..Source.. by STEPHANIE PEDERSEN

Read More of Article...

August 31, 2014

Alabama pastor sues over closure of sex offender camp

See also: Chilton County pastor claims law shutting down ministry for sex offenders violates right to practice Christian faith and Federal Court Complaint
8-29-2014 Alabama:

BIRMINGHAM – An Alabama pastor who let convicted sex offenders live in a camp behind his rural church filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday claiming a state law that forced him to shut down the operation violated his religious rights.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the complaint on behalf of Ricky Martin, pastor of Triumph Church in rural Chilton County south of Clanton.

The lawsuit claims Martin believes it is his Christian duty to help people, including sex offenders being released from prison. The suit cites scripture in saying Martin's act of letting the former inmates live in campers behind the church was a ministry.

The suit seeks to overturn a law passed this year to shut down the camp following complaints from area residents.

The law, passed by the Alabama Legislature but only affecting Chilton County, bars convicted sex offenders from living within 300 feet of each other on the same piece of property.

The law took effect July 1, forcing Martin to make the men leave the property where some had lived for more than three years.

"All I am trying to do is follow the teachings of Jesus Christ and care for those who are in need of assistance," Martin said in a statement released by the ACLU. "But now the government is prohibiting me from doing what the Lord is asking of me."

The suit names the sheriff and district attorney in Chilton County, where officials said the camp posed a threat to public safety.

Assistant District Attorney C.J. Robinson, who spearheaded work to pass the law, said he had not seen the complaint and declined comment. Sheriff Kevin Davis did not return a message seeking comment.

Martin, in a June interview with The Associated Press, said he opened the camp in 2010 after meeting inmates while working as a volunteer chaplain in state prisons. Many had nowhere to live after finishing their sentences because Alabama and other states restrict the areas where sex offenders are allowed to live, he said.

County officials began noticing an influx of inmates to the same address at the church after receiving notices under laws that mandate public notices about residences of convicted sex offenders.

A legislative sponsor and county prosecutor said the law was aimed at shutting down the camp.

"This law directly targets our client — a minister — because of his deeply held Christian beliefs. The government cannot single out and strong-arm people of faith in this way," ACLU attorney Heather Weaver said in a statement. ..Source.. by Jay Reeves

Read More of Article...

August 29, 2014

Appeals Court: Judge must consider bond motion for man held in sex offender slaying

8-29-2014 Alabama:

MONTGOMERY, Alabama — A state appeals court says a Cullman County judge must consider a bond request by a father charged with killing the man who molested his daughter.

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals ruled Thursday that Circuit Judge Gregory Nicholas must hear a motion to reduce the $141,000 cash bond set in the case.

Nicholas previously refused to consider the request, saying a district judge had to rule first.

The father is accused of murder and other charges in two shootings, including one that killed 59-year-old Raymond Earl Brooks in June.

Brooks pleaded guilty in 2001 and served more than two years in prison for sexually abusing the man's daughter.

The Associated Press doesn't identify victims in sex crimes, and it isn't naming the father to protect the daughter. ..Source.. by Daily Journal

Read More of Article...

July 3, 2014

ACLU: Law banning sex offender camp might violate Alabama's constitution

7-3-2014 Alabama:

CLANTON, Alabama — A new law used to shut down a church-affiliated camp for convicted sex offenders in rural Alabama violates a state constitutional amendment designed to protect religious liberty, the American Civil Liberties Union said Thursday.

Randall Marshall, legal director of the ACLU's Alabama office, said the law that went into effect this week is in apparent conflict with the Alabama Religious Freedom Amendment, passed in 1998 to make it tougher for government to infringe on religious rights.

Pastor Ricky Martin says he built a church in rural Chilton County and allowed convicted sex offenders to move to the property because the men had nowhere else to live. He said he was trying to follow biblical instructions to help the outcast.

The camp, which began accepting former inmates in 2010, closed when the new law took effect Tuesday.

Marshall said the amendment "raises serious questions" about the law, which was passed this year and affects Chilton County only. The amendment says laws can restrict religion narrowly only if there is a "compelling governmental interest."

Martin "has sincerely held religious beliefs that he's acting upon, and now you've got government prohibiting him from doing something that he considers part of his religion," Marshall said.

The sponsor of the bill, state Rep. Kurt Wallace, said the law is meant to protect the public from people convicted of rape, child molestation and other crimes.
PHOTO: A gravel drives leads to a camp inhabited by convicted sex offenders behind Triumph Church near Clanton, Ala., on Monday, June 30, 2014. A law that took effect Tuesday, July 1, 2014 shut down the refuge, which Pastor Rick Martin says he founded to follow the Bible's instructions to care for the outcast. A prosecutor wrote a law passed earlier in the year to outlaw the camp by barring convicted sex offenders from living within 300 feet of each other on the same piece of property in Chilton County. (AP Photo/Jay Reeves)
A gravel drives leads to a camp inhabited by convicted sex offenders behind Triumph Church near Clanton, Ala., on Monday, June 30, 2014. A law that took effect Tuesday, July 1, 2014 shut down the refuge, which Pastor Rick Martin says he founded to follow the Bible's instructions to care for the outcast. A prosecutor wrote a law passed earlier in the year to outlaw the camp by barring convicted sex offenders from living within 300 feet of each other on the same piece of property in Chilton County. (AP Photo/Jay Reeves)

Most of the more than 50 men who've lived in the camp through the years are from other counties and states, officials said.

"No religion is being disenfranchised," Wallace said. "He can practice any religion he wants, but he can't recruit sex offenders to our community. That's just crazy."

Martin hasn't sued to block the law, but he said he might. Some of the half-dozen men who were living in old campers behind his Triumph Church are now homeless, he said.

"I don't know what they're doing, just walking around trying to find a place to sleep," he said.

The law, which Wallace said was drafted with Martin's refuge in mind, prohibits two convicted sex offenders from living within 300 feet of each other on the same property in Chilton County unless they are married. It includes a provision to allow a state-approved counseling center or halfway house if one opened, Wallace said.

Martin, who serves as a volunteer prison chaplain, said the camp was needed because inmates serving time for sex-related offenses have a hard time finding suitable residences after release.

Like other states, Alabama restricts the areas where sex offenders are required to live, barring anyone convicted of certain crimes to reside within 2,000 feet of a school or day care. Laws are even stricter about where offenders can work or hang out, restricting them from being within 500 feet of parks, athletic fields or businesses where kids gather.

Inmates serving time for sex crimes must tell authorities where they plan to live following their release, and prisons or county jails must continue holding anyone who can't prove they have a legal place to live. ..Source.. by JAY REEVES

Read More of Article...

July 2, 2014

Alabama shuts down rural church's makeshift camp for convicted sex offenders

7-2-2014 Alabama:

CLANTON, Alabama — Believing it was his calling to reach out to people Jesus called "the least of these," Pastor Ricky Martin built a little church and opened a camp out back for some of society's most unwanted people: Sex offenders.

With the help of some former inmates convicted of rape, sodomy, child sexual abuse and other crimes, Martin raised a gray-block chapel in a rural patch of central Alabama in 2010, and parked old campers and recreational vehicles behind it to house the men. More than 50 convicted sex offenders have lived there since.

The camp came to an end Tuesday, when a law passed by the Alabama Legislature earlier this year shut down Martin's sex offender refuge.

Martin said he will make the remaining men leave the half-dozen campers parked behind the church, although he doesn't like it.

"It's about like it's against my constitutional rights," he said Monday. "This is a state coming against a ministry."

Prosecutor C.J. Robinson, who pushed for the local law that legislators passed to close down the camp, said Monday he doesn't doubt the sincerity of Martin's religious beliefs. He said no one living at the camp has been arrested for additional sex-related crimes. And, he said, sex offenders do need a place to live.

If not behind a tiny church in an agricultural county with about five dozen people per square mile, then where?

Robinson said he doesn't know. But having so many ex-convicts with similar criminal records in one place is a public safety threat, he said, and Martin doesn't have the specialized training and credentials to deal with them.

"I think his motives are good. I just disagree with the way he's going about it," said Robinson, the chief deputy district attorney.

Like other states, Alabama restricts the areas where sex offenders are required to live, barring anyone convicted of certain crimes to reside within 2,000 feet of a school or day care. Laws are even stricter about where offenders can work or hang out, restricting them from being within 500 feet of parks, athletic fields or businesses where kids gather.

Inmates serving time for sex crimes must tell authorities where they plan to live following their release, and prisons or county jails must continue holding anyone who can't prove they have a legal place to live.
PHOTO: A gravel drives leads to a camp inhabited by convicted sex offenders behind Triumph Church near Clanton, Ala., on Monday, June 30, 2014. A law that took effect Tuesday, July 1, 2014 shut down the refuge, which Pastor Rick Martin says he founded to follow the Bible's instructions to care for the outcast. A prosecutor wrote a law passed earlier in the year to outlaw the camp by barring convicted sex offenders from living within 300 feet of each other on the same piece of property in Chilton County. (AP Photo/Jay Reeves)
A gravel drives leads to a camp inhabited by convicted sex offenders behind Triumph Church near Clanton, Ala., on Monday, June 30, 2014. A law that took effect Tuesday, July 1, 2014 shut down the refuge, which Pastor Rick Martin says he founded to follow the Bible's instructions to care for the outcast. A prosecutor wrote a law passed earlier in the year to outlaw the camp by barring convicted sex offenders from living within 300 feet of each other on the same piece of property in Chilton County. (AP Photo/Jay Reeves)

Martin, who runs a small upholstery shop beside his Triumph Church when he's not ministering, said he met men with no place to go while serving as a volunteer chaplain in a state prison. He came up with the idea of a sex offender refuge in rural Chilton County, far away from any schools or day care centers, and began screening potential prisoners to live there.

Some of the released prisoners actually helped construct the church, which stands between the road and the camp, which in turn is partially encircled by a wooden privacy fence. The residents, all men, pay when they can and abide by strict rules: No smoking or drinking, and no more sex crimes.

Martin and his wife live in a house and keep watch over the camp and church, which ranges in attendance from a handful to as many as 60 people depending on the day.

"We try to live Christian," said Kenny Dark, who served time for rape and has lived in one of the campers. "We go to the church Wednesday and two times on Sunday. We help each other."

Martin said he is simply living out his faith by offering a hand to people rejected by society.

"You know what Jesus said? He said, 'When you help the least of these you help me,'" said Martin. "No one else will help these people."

Federal law requires local authorities to keep track of sex offenders, and Robinson grew concerned as he saw notice after another about sex offenders moving to the same spot — Martin's one-acre tract just outside Clanton, a town of about 8,700. They came from 28 of Alabama's 67 counties and three states. All but 10 committed crimes against children, Robinson said, and 32 were convicted rapists, including Dark.

Convicted in Talladega County in 1980, Dark has been living in the camp since his release from prison in 2011. He doesn't know where he'll go now that the camp is closing.

"I did my time," said Dark, 56, who works odd jobs. "I'm just trying to live now."

People in the community grew increasingly worried amid an influx of sex offenders, Robinson said, so he wrote a bill to shut down the camp by prohibiting two convicted sex offenders from living within 300 feet of each other on the same property unless they are married. The Legislature passed the measure without a negative vote.

The law only affects Chilton County, where Martin's refuge is located and where people were worried, Robinson said.

People like Debra Morrison, who lives beside the small, nondenominational church. Some of her windows look out at the campers.

"I'm just glad it's over," said Morrison, her young granddaughter at her side. ..Source.. by JAY REEVES

Read More of Article...

January 13, 2014

ACLU Stops Suspicionless Home Searches in Etowah County, Alabama

1-13-2014 Alabama:

MONTGOMERY, Ala. – The American Civil Liberties Union, the American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama, and the law firm Jaffe & Drennan reached a unique settlement Friday in Doe v. Entrekin with the Etowah County Sheriff’s Office, stopping its officers from conducting unannounced, suspicion-less, and warrant-less searches of a family’s home. The sheriff’s office had been performing such searches at the homes of everyone registered for a sexual offense, without exception, ostensibly to verify their residence. Similar programs exist across Alabama and the nation. Under the terms of the settlement, the sheriff’s office will conduct all in-person residence verifications outside a registrant’s home. Officers may not enter the home without the registrant’s written consent at the time of the verification, unless the officers have a warrant or an emergency makes entry necessary.

"The officers had absolutely no authority for these traumatic invasions of their privacy," said Brandon Buskey, ACLU attorney. "Our plaintiffs’ home had been searched numerous times. The registrant has always complied with the state law, and there has never been any reason to believe otherwise. Through this settlement, we have placed important limits on the sheriff’s office’s power in Etowah County that we hope to see throughout the state."

The ACLU’s clients, a family living in Etowah County, were subjected to the sheriff’s office searches because one family member is a registrant. The sheriff’s office conducted these searches even though this plaintiff registers in person at the sheriff’s office four times a year in accordance with state law – a requirement he must fulfill for the rest of his life; the offense occurred when he was 14 years old; he is not on probation or parole; and the state of Alabama determined he is at low risk of reoffending.

The settlement requires the sheriff’s office to make additional changes for registrants who, like the plaintiff, committed their offenses as juveniles, who are no longer on probation or parole, and whom the state has determined to be low risk. For these registrants, the sheriff’s office will be limited to quarterly phone verifications after an initial in-person interview. Officers may conduct subsequent in-person verifications outside the home only if they cannot reach the registrant by phone within the quarter after leaving a message, or if there is reason to believe the registrant is not complying with state law. To protect registrants’ privacy, officers conducting such in-person verifications must be wearing civilian clothing and using an unmarked car.

"For low-risk juveniles, our settlement requires officers to contact the person by phone first, and only if that proves unsuccessful over the course of three months can the officers talk to the person outside the home," Susan Watson, executive director of the ACLU of Alabama, explained. "The settlement is a significant improvement over the old way: demanding entry into a family’s house and threatening arrest if they don’t comply." ..Source.. by ACLU Alabama

Read More of Article...

September 12, 2013

ACLU files suit against Etowah County Sheriff over registered sex offender house searches

9-12-2013 Alabama:

GADSDEN, Alabama -- The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against Etowah County Sheriff Todd Entrekin and two officers in the department over what they say are "unannounced, random, and suspicionless" searches of the home of a registered sex offender.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, does not name the three family members. They are identified in the suit as John, Jane and James Doe. The law firm of Jaffe & Drennan filed the suit today, according to a news release.

ACLU Attorney Brandon Buskey said the searches are "unconstitutional harassment."

"These officers are trampling on this family's constitutional rights, and because this is the sheriff's policy, we fear this may be happening over and over again to families around the county," Buskey said in a release.

According to the ACLU, one member of the family is a registered sex offender because of an offense committed as a child. The suit contends he has "fulfilled every requirement" under the offender registration and community notification act. He must register four times a year with the sheriff.

However, the ACLU contends the family is threatened with arrest if they fail to cooperate with random inspections of their home. The suit contends this is a violation of the family's Constitutional rights, because it takes place without a warrant or any reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing.

The suit seeks an end to the searches and the policy of inspecting registered offenders' homes. It also seeks unspecified monetary damages.


Sheriff's Department spokeswoman Natalie Barton said the department was aware of the lawsuit, but had not seen the complaint and had no comment. ..Source.. by William Thornton



Suit to stop (Excessive) sex offender checks filed

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a federal lawsuit against Sheriff Todd Entrekin and his unannounced checks on sex offenders, claiming the checks violate the offenders’ Fourth Amendment rights.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, says the sheriff’s office conducts its unannounced checks without regard to whether the individual was convicted as an adult or a juvenile, the likelihood of reoffending, whether the individual is on probation or parole and whether he or she is compliant with that probation or parole.

The ACLU filed the suit on behalf of a family named only as James, John and Jane Doe. It said James Doe, son of John and Jane, is an Etowah County resident who is required to register as a sex offender and is required to appear quarterly at the sheriff’s office.

Despite this, the suit alleges, deputies have conducted nine separate inspections of the Doe home and routinely search the home without consent during the inspections. The suit said the inspections have gone on since April 2012.

According to the suit, James Doe was convicted Aug. 17, 2011, on three counts of first-degree sexual abuse and one count of first-degree sodomy. He was committed to the Alabama Department of Youth Services Sexual Offender Program on that day, and was in a court-mandated treatment program at Mt. Meigs Juvenile Detention Center until Nov. 28 of that year, when he successfully completed it.

James Doe was characterized on Feb. 9, 2012, as a “low-risk” sex offender. The Etowah County Circuit Court sided with the Department of Youth Services and ruled him low-risk over objections by the state. The suit said under the Alabama Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act, Doe is only required to check in quarterly.

Entrekin had little to say about the suit because it is still pending and will be decided in court, but he defended his office’s checks on sex offenders.

“With the world we live in, we feel strongly about how we handle our sex offenders,” Entrekin said. “We look forward to our day in court.” ..Source.. by John Davidson

Read More of Article...

May 20, 2012

Exoneration lists expose causes for wrong convictions in Jefferson County and across nation

5-20-2012 Alabama & National:

Five men from Jefferson County and 12 others convicted but later cleared in Alabama courts are listed on a new national exoneration registry designed to highlight the issue of wrongful convictions and explain why they happen.

The registry, compiled by the University of Michigan Law School and the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University School of Law, profiles 873 cases from January 1989 through February 2012. The registry is available to the public online: now available HERE.

Each convicted defendant was later cleared through DNA, confession by the real criminal or other circumstances. Most involved murder and sexual assault cases.

The cases highlight the legal pitfalls that can lead to wrong convictions, said authors of a study based on the registry, Samuel Gross and Michael Shaffer.

"The more we learn about false convictions, the better we'll be at preventing them -- or if that fails, finding and correcting them as best we can after the fact," Gross said in a statement.

The study found that bad eyewitness testimony was a factor in 94 percent of the exonerations, either because a person mistakenly identified the defendant or lied to put him behind bars.

Alabama, with one federal and 16 state exonerations on the registry, ranked 14th nationally for total false convictions. Broken down per capita, Alabama ranked 10th nationally, according to the report.

But the study's authors said the numbers can be misleading, because states like Alabama, Illinois and Michigan with larger Death Row populations and organizations dedicated to ferret out wrongly-convicted people will be disproportionately represented.

Also, cases such as homicide and sexual assault, which often involve DNA evidence and result in longer sentences, are more likely to provide the means and time needed to prove the wrong person was convicted, the study found.

Nearly 6 in 10 of the people on the registry were cleared by DNA. It took an average of 12 years from conviction and 13 years from arrest for them to find justice, the study found.

Alabama Attorney General Luther Strange said he has confidence in the integrity of state criminal proceedings.

"The many safeguards in place provide sufficient opportunity to correct the very few errors that are made," he said in a statement. "Sixteen errors out of tens of thousands of convictions does not indicate a systemic problem but rather supports the high degree of accuracy in our proceedings."

High number

The study's authors concluded the actual number of wrong convictions is much higher.

Gross and Shaffer intentionally defined exoneration narrowly, only listing on the registry cases the authors identified in which a court, prosecutor, or governor found post-conviction evidence of innocence persuasive enough to drop the charge, release the defendant, order a new trial that resulted in acquittal or issue a pardon.

"It is clear that the exonerations we found are the tip of an iceberg," said Gross, a University of Michigan law professor and editor of the registry. "Most people who are falsely convicted are not exonerated; they serve their time or die in prison. And when they are exonerated, a lot of times it happens quietly."

More than 90 percent of the exonerated defendants are male. Half are black.

About 15 percent of the exonerations involved people who confessed to crimes they did not commit. Often these were juveniles or mentally-disabled defendants, the study found.

The study also found the main factors behind wrong convictions varied by crime:

Murder: Perjury or false accusations were found in nearly two-thirds of those exonerations. Official misconduct, from suggestive interview techniques to fabrication of evidence, also was found in more than half of those cases.

Adult sexual assaults: Mistaken witness identification was involved 80 percent of the time, and was especially prevalent when victim and defendant were different races. Nearly 4 in 10 cases also involved false or misleading forensic evidence.

Child sex abuse: The accuser most often made up the crime, the study found. Official misconduct also was found in more than one-third of the cases.

Many child-abuse exonerations stemmed from what the authors called the "hysteria cases" of the 1980s and 1990s. They included prosecutions such as the McMartin Preschool case in California in which several adults were charged with molesting dozens of children in what proved to be false accusations.

Robbery: Mistaken eyewitness identification was found in 80 percent of those exonerations.

Gross and Shaffer said the justice system needs to be more careful that mistakes are not made on the front end, and more open to genuine evidence of innocence post conviction. Alabama's attorney general, however, said the courts provide sufficient safeguards to correct genuine mistakes.

"The courts remain open to considering strong evidence of actual innocence," Strange said. "Oftentimes, post conviction courts are flooded with weak theories of innocence rather than actual evidence supporting innocence."

Jefferson County

Here are the cases of five men convicted in Jefferson County Circuit Court who are listed in a new national registry of exonerations:

Freddie Lee Gaines: Charged in a 1973 double homicide, he was acquitted in one death and convicted in the other. Gaines was released for good behavior after 11 years in prison. Five years later, in 1990, another man confessed to the crimes. Gaines received $1 million in state compensation, but was not pardoned until 2005.

Dale and Ronnie Mahan: Convicted of a 1984 kidnapping and rape, Dale was sentenced in Bessemer to 35 years and Ronnie received life without parole as a habitual offender. They were released after nearly 14 years when testing that was not available before trial showed they did not leave DNA found on the victim. She still maintained she was attacked by two men, but admitted she had sex with a man other than her husband earlier that day.

Louis Griffin: After his arrest on federal racketeering charges, the New York street gang member took credit for a 1992 drug-debt slaying in Birmingham. But when he and another man went on trial in Birmingham in 1997, Griffin said he made it all up to get a lighter sentence in his federal case. Both men were convicted, with Griffin getting a death sentence and the other man a life term. Griffin won a new trial in 2000 and was acquitted in 2001, but went to federal prison for the racketeering case.

Wesley Quick: Charged in the 1995 shooting deaths of two teens near Pinson, his first prosecution ended in mistrial due to juror misconduct. He was convicted and sentenced to death in 1997, but won a new trial and was acquitted in 2003. The trial judge then sentenced Quick to 76 years in prison after he pleaded guilty to three burglaries, including one in which the murder weapon was stolen. ..Source.. by Eric Velasco -- The Birmingham News

Read More of Article...

February 14, 2012

$408K grant to rehab young sex offenders

2-14-2012 Alabama:

MONTGOMERY, AL (WSFA)- The Alabama Department of Youth Services is being awarded a $408,000 grant to rehabilitate young sex offenders, according to Governor Robert Bentley's office.

The governor's office said the money will go toward continuation of a DYS program that holds juvenile sex offenders accountable while seeking to change their behavior.

The program, called Continuum of Care, is available in 15 counties across Alabama including Autauga, Elmore, and Montgomery counties.

"Youthful offenders in this program have an opportunity that may not be available later in life—a chance to turn away from a life of crime," Bentley said. "I commend the program staff for their commitment to helping these juveniles turn their lives around before it's too late."

The community-based program is for nonviolent offenders who are ordered to participate as an alternative to juvenile detention. Offenders who have been released from detention also participate in the program when they return to their homes. Juveniles ages 10-12 identified by courts or community agencies as displaying at-risk behavior may also be ordered to participate in the program.

The grant is being administered by the Alabama Department of Economic and Community Affairs (ADECA) and is being made available from a U.S. Department of Justice grant.

The governor's office said matching funds of $45,352 will supplement the grant. ..Source.. by WSFA 12 News Staff

Read More of Article...

November 6, 2010

Alabama's sex offender notification law can't apply to homeless, state appeals court rules

11-6-2010 Alabama:

MONTGOMERY, Alabama -- A state appeals court ruled today that an Alabama law requiring sex offenders to give an address where they will be living before getting out of prison can't be applied to a homeless inmate with no money.

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals ruled 4-0 that the arrest of Thornal Lee Adams for violating the law was unconstitutional because he was punished for being homeless.

"Adams continued to be incarcerated and ultimately charged for reasons that were beyond his control — his indigency and resulting homelessness," Judge Sam Welch wrote.

The appeals court said the law was intended to help law enforcement keep up with sex offenders following their release from prison and to notify residents in the neighborhoods where they will reside. But state law makes it "virtually nil" for indigent sex offenders to ever get out of jail even though they have finished their sentences for their sex crimes.

The court said its ruling applies only to the facts in Adams' case and the law could be applied constitutionally in other cases where an inmate has living options before his release.

Adams' attorney, David Schoen, called the decision "stunning in its recognition of the unique hardships that poverty places on members of our society, and it speaks in the strongest terms possible against penalizing that status through the criminal law."

Suzanne Webb, spokeswoman for Attorney General Troy King, said he would appeal the decision to the Alabama Supreme Court.

Alabama's Community Notification Act requires sex offenders to give an address where they will be living before they finish their sentences and get out of prison. Not giving an address is a felony that results in them being rearrested when they start to leave prison and carries a sentence of one to 10 years in prison.

Adams, who was convicted of rape and sodomy, said he couldn't give an address before his release in 2008 because he had no family to take him in, he had no money for an apartment, and he couldn't find space in a halfway house. He was arrested upon his release and placed in the Montgomery County jail for violating the law.

Circuit Judge Truman Hobbs Jr. tossed out the charge, and the appeals court agreed with him.

The attorney general's staff argued that the law is constitutional because an inmate only has to give a location, such as "a park bench, a bridge, or some other geographical space" where he could be found by law enforcement. The appeals court said the attorney general was ignoring the plain language of the law which requires an address where mail can be received.

In the 70-page ruling, the court said Alabama's law amounts to cruel and unusual punishment, but the Legislature can develop constitutional ways to track homeless indigent sex offenders. The court even outlined what other states have done.

At the time of Adams' case in 2008, the law required a sex offender to give an address 45 days before his release. In 2009, the Legislature toughened the law to require 180 days. ..Source.. by Phillip Rawls

Read More of Article...

October 13, 2010

Auburn Police Buckle Down On Sex Offenders Thanks To A Federal Grant

10-13-2010 Alabama:

They are not allowed to live near schools, daycares, or churches, but it is easy for a registered sex offender to blend in with the community.

The Auburn Police Department received a "Child Sexual Predator Program" grant from the United States Department of Justice through their "Community Oriented Policing Services" (COPS) Office.

The grant is worth $110,500. It is designed to reduce and prevent child endangerment and protect communities from sexual predators. "The safety and well-being of our children is crucial to a healthy community and the grant will assist us in our efforts in this area," said Auburn Police Chief Tommy Dawson.

Auburn is the only department in the state of Alabama to receive the grant this year. Dawson said the money will be spent in investigations, education, and personnel to help with sexual abuse cases.

"This is huge, and it means a lot for our department to receive such an award," said Lieutenant Steve Woods. Woods investigates and regulates all registered sex offenders in the Auburn area. "One sex offender is one too many," said Dawson.

The Auburn Police Division was nominated for the grant by the United States Attorney's Office and the United States Marshals Service for the Middle District of Alabama. ..Source.. by Christina Chambers

Read More of Article...

August 13, 2010

Federal appeals court reverses ruling on sex offenders' lawsuit

8-13-2010 Alabama:

A federal appeals court has reversed a U.S. District Court judge's decision to throw out a lawsuit filed by four sex offenders who say Jefferson County's sheriff should not be allowed to hold them after serving their sentences just because they are poor and don't have a place to call home.

Share Alabama's Community Notification Act requires that before convicted sex offenders can be freed at the end of their sentences, they must provide an address where they will live after their release. The residence must meet certain requirements, including not being within a certain distance of a school.

If an inmate completes a sentence but can not provide an approved address, he or she can be held by the local sheriff in jail indefinitely, according to the state law.

district court failed to appreciate that this claim, if successful, would not affect the validity of their conviction nor the resulting sentence imposed, and would not necessarily result in immediate release," according to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling.

One of the three judges had agreed that the judge had made the right decision in dismissing the case.

The lawsuit now goes back to Coogler, unless Hale or the State of Alabama seeks a rehearing before the appeals court.

"All this does really is let us proceed with this case," said Kira Fonteneau, attorney representing the sex offenders. "It's a great first step ... It (the appeals ruling) doesn't determine anything as to what is going to happen with the case."

Sheriff's officials said they will not appeal the ruling and will continue to fight the case in the lower court.

They feel strongly about it, Sheriff Mike Hale said, because victims of sexual assault and sexual abuse have a very difficult time putting their lives back together, if ever, especially victims who are children.

"The argument that these offenders have paid their debt carries little weight with us," Hale said. "The laws involving sex offenders were created with one thing in mind and that is to protect others from becoming victims."

"We strongly believe they are trying to create a loophole in that law by claiming to be indigent so they may go about in society unmonitored," Hale said. "We will fight that vigorously and look forward to the case being considered by the lower courts."

Closing a loophole

The sheriff said he will ask the state legislators to strengthen the law closing any such loophole possibility.

"We agree with the state of Alabama that they must provide a legitimate address before being released back into our society," he said.

Chief Deputy Randy Christian said investigators would have little success doing that if a sex offender was released without authorities having the ability to warn the public about who they are, what they look like and where they intend to live.

"Our job is to be advocates for crime victims and protect potential victims. Not only is that the right thing to do, but Sheriff Hale demands it," Christian said.

The four men -- Sidney Gipson, William McGuirk, Timothy Guthery and James Sasser -- had sued in 2008. Their lawsuit asks that a procedure be put in place to determine if they are indigent. If they are deemed indigent, provisions would be made for them to comply with the law without being indefinitely held in jail.

Lack of a process

If the state is going to require people to get housing then there ought to be some process for people who can't afford to get housing, Fonteneau said. "The law does not provide a process for law enforcement or the individual to deal with it ... There's just nothing there," she said.

Gipson and McGuirk remain in the Jefferson County Jail, while Guthery and Sasser have been released.

Fonteneau said she doesn't know exactly how many inmates in the Jefferson County jail are in the same position as the four men who filed the lawsuit.

Christian said Wednesday there were six inmates in the county jail who have provided addresses, but they aren't compliant with the law, so they haven't been released. Either the addresses don't exist or they fail to meet with guidelines, for example, being too close to a school, he said. One inmate continues to be held because he hasn't provided any address at all, he said. ..Source.. by Kent Faulk -- The Birmingham News

Read More of Article...

August 12, 2010

Ala. sex offenders' lawsuit reinstated

8-12-2010 Alabama:

A federal appeals court has reversed a U.S. District Court judge's decision and reinstated a lawsuit filed by four sex offenders.

The sex offenders say Jefferson County's sheriff should not be allowed to keep them in jail after they finish their sentences just because they don't have a place to call home. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to a lowe court for reconsideration.

Alabama's Community Notification Act requires that before convicted sex offenders can be freed, they must provide an address where they will live after their release.

If an inmate completes a sentence but can not provide an approved address, he or she can be kept in jail.

The lawsuit now goes back to U.S. District Court Judge Scott Coogler. ..Source.. by The Gadsden Times via ReFORM Alabama

Read More of Article...