10-8-2013 Washington DC, Arizona:
A federal appeals court is getting ready to hear the case of a boy who was prosecuted for engaging in sex acts with other boys when he was just 10 years old, The Wall Street Journal reports.
Lawyers for the unnamed boy are appealing a court's ruling that found him "delinquent" — the juvenile equivalent of guilty — for having sex with other young boys on an Arizona Army base.
That boy was sentenced to five years of probation, and he's being forced to register as a sex offender. A federal prosecutor told the Journal that the government decided to prosecute the boy because of the "severity of the conduct" involving five boys between the ages of 5 and 7.
The boy's public defender, Keith Hilzendeger, told the Journal he'd never heard of a federal case involving a 10-year-old. "I think this is really overreaching on the part of the government," he said.
Perhaps the worst part of the case involving Hilzendeger's client is his placement on the sex offender registry. In 2007, The New York Times Magazine had a moving story about the stigma and trauma inflicted on young people who were officially registered as "sex offenders."
One boy profiled in that story, Johnnie, had molested his half-sister when he was 11 and she was 4. Four years later, he started the eighth grade at his Delaware middle school and noticed the other kids pointing at him and laughing.
“Hey, aren’t you a sex offender?" one boy asked.
The latest case involving the Arizona Army base being heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit could force the government to justify putting kids on sex offender registries. In the end, the benefit to public safety may not outweigh the harm to the young children on that list, many of whom may be victims of sexual abuse themselves. ..Source.. by Erin Fuchs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)



I hate that the WSJ has made this a paid access article, because the quote from the prosecutor in the case.
ReplyDeleteProsecutor Bruce Ferg counters that the prosecution "is the best thing that could've happened to the kid."
Shoot as that kids age, it's more of a curiosity than a deviance. The laws they created to protect children are the same ones harming them.
ReplyDeleteThe DA should be prosecuted for child endangerment by placing them on a registry.
I have a PDF of the WSJ article posted here.
ReplyDeletehttp://tinyurl.com/mz7cjy9
sa how something that is suppose to "protect children" is doing the oppasete
ReplyDeleteThese kind of stories outrage me. Ten year old boys do not act like this. What has this kid seen, or who messed with him? What kind of investigation was done? So somehow he is a victom, and now he's going to be punished for life. Does any of this make sense to anyone out there? The registry is not helping anything. There is proof it harms millions. Every person on it does not get the chance to make amends. Does not get a chance to start over after paying their debt to society. Instead they get to be embarrassed, and humiliated for the rest of their life. What about their family, their children? They also pay forever more. Prove registry helps anything, the way it harms millions. This is the perfect example.
ReplyDelete