Never forget those who have died because of various sex offender laws.

December 22, 2012

Congress passes measure to keep sex offenders out of the military

See earlier report HERE (S-3254 was ultimately passed). As to the Army's report of sexual assaults in 2011 [actually 2010 link below], it makes no mention that any of them were by formerly convicted sex offenders (registrants). Folks need to counter any claims that registrants were to blame.
12-1-2012 Washington DC:

On Friday the U.S. Senate passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which included an amendment authored by Sen. Barbara Boxer banning anyone convicted of a felony sex crime from joining the armed forces.

“We owe it to our brave service members to do everything we can to protect them from sexual assault,” said Boxer (D-CA). “The action of both the Senate and the House will strengthen the military’s zero tolerance policy for these heinous acts of violence by permanently banning those convicted of felony sex crimes from serving in our military.”

The policy was put in place administratively by Defense Secretary Robert Gates in 2009, but Sen. Boxer’s amendment would codify the ban into law, making the change permanent.

The House passed the NDAA conference report on Thursday.

In 2011 alone, 3,192 incidents of sexual assault were reported in the military. According to the Department of Defense, this figure may significantly underestimate the actual number of sexual assaults, and the actual number may be closer to 19,000 annually.

In addition, service members who receive a conduct waiver are more likely to commit a sexual assault.

According to a report recently published by the Army (Found HERE 622 pg PDF), soldiers that entered the military with conduct waivers were more likely to commit a felony sex crime while on active duty than soldiers who entered the military without waivers.

The National Defense Authorization Act now goes to President Barack Obama for his signature. ..Source.. by Lake County News (See also HERE)

1 comment:

  1. "more likely" is problematic. Relative statistics are useless and misleading and should never be used to justify actions like this. My classic example is this: statistically, men are 10 times more likely than women to molest children. By this "relative thinking" it is obvious that men should never be allowed to be around children! Virtually all applications of relative statistics are equally ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete

We use the Disqus Commenting system, please wait for it to load. Also, comments are moderated, please stick to the issue of the post, as we are trying to have an intelligent, relevant discussion which develops the post. Comments deviating from topic of post will not be posted. Thanks