Never forget those who have died because of various sex offender laws.
Showing posts with label Lawsuit - AL. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lawsuit - AL. Show all posts

September 12, 2013

ACLU files suit against Etowah County Sheriff over registered sex offender house searches

9-12-2013 Alabama:

GADSDEN, Alabama -- The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a lawsuit against Etowah County Sheriff Todd Entrekin and two officers in the department over what they say are "unannounced, random, and suspicionless" searches of the home of a registered sex offender.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, does not name the three family members. They are identified in the suit as John, Jane and James Doe. The law firm of Jaffe & Drennan filed the suit today, according to a news release.

ACLU Attorney Brandon Buskey said the searches are "unconstitutional harassment."

"These officers are trampling on this family's constitutional rights, and because this is the sheriff's policy, we fear this may be happening over and over again to families around the county," Buskey said in a release.

According to the ACLU, one member of the family is a registered sex offender because of an offense committed as a child. The suit contends he has "fulfilled every requirement" under the offender registration and community notification act. He must register four times a year with the sheriff.

However, the ACLU contends the family is threatened with arrest if they fail to cooperate with random inspections of their home. The suit contends this is a violation of the family's Constitutional rights, because it takes place without a warrant or any reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing.

The suit seeks an end to the searches and the policy of inspecting registered offenders' homes. It also seeks unspecified monetary damages.


Sheriff's Department spokeswoman Natalie Barton said the department was aware of the lawsuit, but had not seen the complaint and had no comment. ..Source.. by William Thornton



Suit to stop (Excessive) sex offender checks filed

The American Civil Liberties Union has filed a federal lawsuit against Sheriff Todd Entrekin and his unannounced checks on sex offenders, claiming the checks violate the offenders’ Fourth Amendment rights.

The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, says the sheriff’s office conducts its unannounced checks without regard to whether the individual was convicted as an adult or a juvenile, the likelihood of reoffending, whether the individual is on probation or parole and whether he or she is compliant with that probation or parole.

The ACLU filed the suit on behalf of a family named only as James, John and Jane Doe. It said James Doe, son of John and Jane, is an Etowah County resident who is required to register as a sex offender and is required to appear quarterly at the sheriff’s office.

Despite this, the suit alleges, deputies have conducted nine separate inspections of the Doe home and routinely search the home without consent during the inspections. The suit said the inspections have gone on since April 2012.

According to the suit, James Doe was convicted Aug. 17, 2011, on three counts of first-degree sexual abuse and one count of first-degree sodomy. He was committed to the Alabama Department of Youth Services Sexual Offender Program on that day, and was in a court-mandated treatment program at Mt. Meigs Juvenile Detention Center until Nov. 28 of that year, when he successfully completed it.

James Doe was characterized on Feb. 9, 2012, as a “low-risk” sex offender. The Etowah County Circuit Court sided with the Department of Youth Services and ruled him low-risk over objections by the state. The suit said under the Alabama Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act, Doe is only required to check in quarterly.

Entrekin had little to say about the suit because it is still pending and will be decided in court, but he defended his office’s checks on sex offenders.

“With the world we live in, we feel strongly about how we handle our sex offenders,” Entrekin said. “We look forward to our day in court.” ..Source.. by John Davidson

Read More of Article...

August 13, 2010

Federal appeals court reverses ruling on sex offenders' lawsuit

8-13-2010 Alabama:

A federal appeals court has reversed a U.S. District Court judge's decision to throw out a lawsuit filed by four sex offenders who say Jefferson County's sheriff should not be allowed to hold them after serving their sentences just because they are poor and don't have a place to call home.

Share Alabama's Community Notification Act requires that before convicted sex offenders can be freed at the end of their sentences, they must provide an address where they will live after their release. The residence must meet certain requirements, including not being within a certain distance of a school.

If an inmate completes a sentence but can not provide an approved address, he or she can be held by the local sheriff in jail indefinitely, according to the state law.

district court failed to appreciate that this claim, if successful, would not affect the validity of their conviction nor the resulting sentence imposed, and would not necessarily result in immediate release," according to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling.

One of the three judges had agreed that the judge had made the right decision in dismissing the case.

The lawsuit now goes back to Coogler, unless Hale or the State of Alabama seeks a rehearing before the appeals court.

"All this does really is let us proceed with this case," said Kira Fonteneau, attorney representing the sex offenders. "It's a great first step ... It (the appeals ruling) doesn't determine anything as to what is going to happen with the case."

Sheriff's officials said they will not appeal the ruling and will continue to fight the case in the lower court.

They feel strongly about it, Sheriff Mike Hale said, because victims of sexual assault and sexual abuse have a very difficult time putting their lives back together, if ever, especially victims who are children.

"The argument that these offenders have paid their debt carries little weight with us," Hale said. "The laws involving sex offenders were created with one thing in mind and that is to protect others from becoming victims."

"We strongly believe they are trying to create a loophole in that law by claiming to be indigent so they may go about in society unmonitored," Hale said. "We will fight that vigorously and look forward to the case being considered by the lower courts."

Closing a loophole

The sheriff said he will ask the state legislators to strengthen the law closing any such loophole possibility.

"We agree with the state of Alabama that they must provide a legitimate address before being released back into our society," he said.

Chief Deputy Randy Christian said investigators would have little success doing that if a sex offender was released without authorities having the ability to warn the public about who they are, what they look like and where they intend to live.

"Our job is to be advocates for crime victims and protect potential victims. Not only is that the right thing to do, but Sheriff Hale demands it," Christian said.

The four men -- Sidney Gipson, William McGuirk, Timothy Guthery and James Sasser -- had sued in 2008. Their lawsuit asks that a procedure be put in place to determine if they are indigent. If they are deemed indigent, provisions would be made for them to comply with the law without being indefinitely held in jail.

Lack of a process

If the state is going to require people to get housing then there ought to be some process for people who can't afford to get housing, Fonteneau said. "The law does not provide a process for law enforcement or the individual to deal with it ... There's just nothing there," she said.

Gipson and McGuirk remain in the Jefferson County Jail, while Guthery and Sasser have been released.

Fonteneau said she doesn't know exactly how many inmates in the Jefferson County jail are in the same position as the four men who filed the lawsuit.

Christian said Wednesday there were six inmates in the county jail who have provided addresses, but they aren't compliant with the law, so they haven't been released. Either the addresses don't exist or they fail to meet with guidelines, for example, being too close to a school, he said. One inmate continues to be held because he hasn't provided any address at all, he said. ..Source.. by Kent Faulk -- The Birmingham News

Read More of Article...